States, in particular, in essays in honor of justice ruth bader. August 27, 2019 united states court of appeals for the. Even when illegally seized evidence is excluded from the governments case in chief, the court has held that the evidence may still be used to impeach a defendants own testimony on direct examina tion, walder v. The possibility that application of the exclusionary rule in a situation may deter fourth amendment violations to some extent is not enough.
The decision of the united states district court for the eastern district of pennsylvania, dated september 10, 2004, is. The supreme court has not extended the exclusionary rule to proceedings. King, which upheld a similar law in maryland, did not apply in this case because of significant differences between each state s dna collection laws. United states case brief united states supreme court 555 u.
Judge keary issued an amended judgment and commitment order for mr. Epic today filed a friend of the court brief pdf in the united states supreme. United states epic electronic privacy information center. The court decided that the goodfaith exception to the exclusionary rule applies when a police officer makes an arrest based on an outstanding warrant in another jurisdiction, but the information regarding that warrant is later found to be incorrect because of a. Given these unique facts, we find it inappropriate to decide the case on the basis that secretary finletter and judge advocate general harmon were not officers of the court. In herring, a police officer, suspicious of the defendant who was seeking to gather something from his im pounded truck, requested a warrant check. However, the situation was complicated by the fact that the initial search had been made on a faulty arrest warrant. Epic has participated as amicus in several cases concerning the collection of dna. The coffee county, alabama sheriffs department apprehended bennie herring in july of 2004. Argued october 7, 2008decided january 14, 2009 officers in coffee county arrested petitioner herring based on a war. Extension of the goodfaith exception to the exclusionary rule in fourth amendment cases.
An officer learned that the eventual defendant, herring, was at the impound lot. Justice ginsburg, with whom justice stevens, justice souter, and justice breyer join, dissenting petitioner bennie dean herring was arrested, and subjected to a search incident to his arrest, although no warrant was outstanding against him, and the police lacked probable cause to believe he was engaged in criminal activity. Where it is feasible, a syllabus headnote will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The court decided that the goodfaith exception to the exclusionary rule applies when a police officer makes an arrest based on an outstanding warrant in another jurisdiction, but the information regarding that warrant is later found to be incorrect because. Audio transcription for opinion announcement january 14, 2009 in herring v. Bennie dean herring was arrested after inspector mark anderson of the coffee county, alabama police. Contributor names stewart, potter judge supreme court of the united states author. An act to provide for intervention by the united states, direct appeals to the supreme court. This is a case about whether the police can use evidence they find as a result of a mistaken arrest. Syllabus officers in coffee county arrested petitioner herring based on a warrant listed in neighboring dale countys database. Upon searching herring s vehicle, officers discovered methamphetamine in herring s pocket and a gun under the seat of his truck. United states on writ of certiorari to the united states court of appeals for the eleventh circuit january 14, 2009 justice ginsburg, with whom justice stevens, justice souter, and justice breyer join, dissenting. Upon searching herrings vehicle, officers discovered methamphetamine in herrings pocket and a gun under the seat of his truck. Dissent, ginsburg html pdf dissent, breyer html pdf herring v.
Earlier this month, the united states supreme court decided herring v. To view pdf files listed on this page you will need adobe acrobat reader. The court decided that the goodfaith exception to the exclusionary rule applies when a police officer makes an arrest based on an outstanding warrant in another jurisdict. The court said that a memorandum opinion would follow. United states,8 on the surface, a gardenvariety fourth amendment exclusionary rule case, takes on special resonance. Learn vocabulary, terms, and more with flashcards, games, and other study tools. United states, a 2009 decision, the supreme court for the first time applied the goodfaith exception to bar application of the exclusionary rule in a. Roberts, jr i have our opinion this morning in case 075, herring versus united states.
The central thesis of this essay is that, consistent with the art of overruling, the court could have limited mapp, for example, by extending the goodfaith reasonable mistake rationale that animates cases like united states v. Epic has participated as amicus in several cases concerning the collection of. Herrings postconviction claim 19 on september 17, 1999, herring filed his petition for postconviction relief. United states even further restricts the application of the exclusionary rule where errors in government databases form the basis for a search. Many documents listed on this page are pdf files that may be viewed using adobereader. Shumaker clerk of court united states of america, plaintiff appellee, no. United states surprised no one, the sweep of the supreme courts opinion was breathtaking. If so, we then determine whether the denial of the evidentiary hearing constituted an abuse of discretion. If the court finds for herring and holds that the exclusionary rule applies to evidence found when law enforcement personnel acted in good faith on erroneous information, it could significantly affect the use and. The court declared, the exclusionary rule serves to deter deliberate, reckless, or grossly negligent conduct. The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the court but has been prepared by the reporter of decisions for the convenience of. Chief justices yearend reports on the federal judiciary supreme court of the united states final list as of 81009 order.
United states will have important consequences for the future of the exclusionary rule. Given this philosophy, justice ginsburgs dissent in herring v. As developed below, the facts of herring are quite similar to the facts of other cases where the court upheld police conduct that, although. Here, we hold that, if true, the facts herring alleged in his section 2255. The substance of their complaint is that the purportedly top secret.
United states dates of early supreme court decisions and arguments. The others are heirs of the two other, now deceased, widows in the original action. Herring was indicted in the united states district court for the middle district of alabama for violations of 18 u. Thus, the fourth amendment exclusionary rule,23 generally stated, excludes evidence from criminal trials when that evidence is obtained as a direct result of police con. An officer learned that the eventual defendant, herring, was at the impound lot, retrieving items from his impounded truck. Writing for the panel, judge carnes19 stated that even though the search violated herrings fourth. Concerning a faulty arrest based on incorrect information in a. It enables the judiciary to avoid the taint of partnership in official lawlessness, and it assures the peopleall potential victims of unlawful government conductthat the government would not profit from its lawless behavior. Jan 26, 2009 earlier this month, the united states supreme court decided herring v.
981 1189 1444 1536 44 246 458 575 653 193 1552 1010 1437 334 570 893 788 783 1477 1312 762 550 593 689 1226 1386 1613 1034 1284 570 1509 686 622 33 1265 1089 230 1071 168 1132 1411 689